Policy Fog and Geopolitical Jitters: Why Fintechs Must Bet on a US-China Trade Thaw
For the past five years, fintech leaders have ranked "geopolitical risk" near the top of every survey. In 2025 it finally took the number-one spot. Sixty-one percent of executives now call policy uncertainty their biggest headache, eclipsing even cyber threats and interest-rate volatility. The reason is simple: the global operating environment for cross-border payments, lending, and digital assets has never felt this fragile.
Yet something changed three weeks ago in Busan, South Korea. On the sidelines of APEC, President Trump and President Xi held a 100-minute meeting that produced what both sides described as an "uneasy but workable truce." Tariffs on certain goods were rolled back, rare-earth export restrictions were paused, and both countries agreed to negotiate a broader 12-month framework by April 2026. Markets reacted immediately. Soybean futures jumped 8 percent. The Hang Seng rose 2.5 percent in a single session. Shipping insurers quietly began cutting war-risk premiums in the South China Sea.
For fintech platforms, this is more than a diplomatic footnote. It is the clearest signal in years that the worst of the US-China trade war may be behind us, at least for now. The stakes are enormous. A sustained thaw could unlock tens of billions in lower-cost remittances, stabilise hardware supply chains for data centres, and restore investor confidence in Asia-Pacific growth stories. A relapse into escalation would do the opposite.
This insight piece examines what the Busan truce actually means for the industry, where the remaining risks still lurk, and why the coming 12–18 months represent a rare window of opportunity for cross-border payments, digital-asset platforms, and Asia-focused lenders.
1. What Was Actually Agreed in Busan
The deal is narrower than the headlines suggest, but still meaningful:
- The US reduced its threatened 100 percent tariffs on certain Chinese goods to 10 percent and suspended new fentanyl-related levies.
- China waived retaliatory duties on US agricultural exports (and committed to buy at least 12 million metric tons of soybeans in 2026).
- Beijing paused new export controls on five mid- and heavy rare earths critical for semiconductors and batteries.
- Both sides waived excess port fees on each other's vessels, effective November 10.
Think of it as a one-year extension of the Phase One agreement that expired in 2024, with a handshake promise to negotiate something deeper in 2026. Markets are treating it as a genuine de-escalation rather than theatre, and early economic indicators support that view.
2. Why This Matters More to Fintech Than to Most Industries
Fintech lives on three things that geopolitics can break overnight: cheap hardware, stable currency pairs, and predictable regulation.
- Hardware: Rare-earth flow directly affects the cost of servers and the GPUs that power fraud detection, credit scoring, and DeFi liquidity pools. A sustained pause on export curbs could lower data-centre CapEx by 8–10 percent within six months.
- Currency and payments: Before the truce, Red Sea disruptions and tariff-induced FX volatility had pushed average remittance fees in ASEAN corridors above 7 percent. Eased logistics and calmer dollar-yuan trading have already trimmed that closer to 5 percent and still falling.
- Investor sentiment: Global fintech funding hit a five-year low of $44.7 billion in H1 2025, with Asia-Pacific deals down 60 percent year-on-year. A credible thaw is the single fastest way to reverse that trend.
3. The Risks That Have Not Gone Away
Optimism must be tempered. Several structural flashpoints remain:
- Tech export controls on advanced chips and AI models are untouched.
- The "affiliates rule" still classifies any company with 50 percent+ Chinese ownership as high-risk for US sanctions.
- State-sponsored cyber attacks on financial infrastructure rose 40 percent in 2025 and show no sign of slowing.
- A single misstep on fentanyl, Taiwan, or the South China Sea could unravel the entire truce.
Looking Ahead
The fog has lifted more than a little, and for the first time in years the path forward looks genuinely brighter. The Busan truce has opened a realistic 12–18 month window in which cross-border friction should keep falling, hardware costs should stabilise or drop, and investor capital should flow back into Asia-Pacific fintech at scale. If the April 2026 follow-up talks in Beijing deliver even a modest "Phase Two" agreement, we could be looking at the most favourable environment for global payments and digital assets since 2017.
History shows that periods of geopolitical calm are when the biggest fintech leaps happen: Alipay and WeChat Pay exploded during the 2013–2017 thaw; Stripe and Adyen scaled across Europe after the US–EU Privacy Shield; Revolut and Nubank raised their breakthrough rounds when trade winds were steady. We are now entering another such cycle.
The platforms, lenders, and investors who move decisively in the coming quarters (diversifying supply chains, hardening security, and expanding into newly attractive corridors) will not just survive the next shock. They will define the next decade of financial technology.
Volatility will never disappear entirely, but right now the tailwinds are stronger than the headwinds. This is the moment to build, to expand, and to lead.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security or financial instrument. Readers should seek independent professional advice tailored to their own circumstances before making any investment decisions. Market conditions can change rapidly, and past performance is not indicative of future results.
Discuss on Finlusion
